Printable Version of Topic

Click here to view this topic in its original format

Respawn LAN Forums _ General Stuff _ DC+ @ v14

Posted by: NoWaY Sep 18 2009, 03:18 PM

What version will be used, I have 0.75(latest) and would like to know whether or not I will get the error message when I try to look at older peoples lists, thanks guys.

-NoWay

Posted by: osprey Sep 18 2009, 03:21 PM

I wuz juzt azkin de saym queshchon. Y descryminat meh juzt cuz I dond speaka le english?

Posted by: Harkonnen Sep 18 2009, 03:22 PM

short answer; use .674 if you have time to hash
.306 if you dont

the only versions you should be using

Posted by: NoWaY Sep 18 2009, 03:25 PM

QUOTE (Harkonnen @ Sep 18 2009, 03:22 PM)

short answer; use .674 if you have time to hash
.306 if you dont

the only versions you should be using

Thank-you, I apologise for my friends inability to speak the old English correctly. Some say he was born in a tube, others say he once 4 downed ZR from vents with a glock. All we know is his called the OSPREY_.

Posted by: Wombie Sep 18 2009, 04:56 PM

correct me if i'm wrong but wouldn't it take MORE effort to type out that bullshit as opposed to real english?

Posted by: Mussels Nov 8 2009, 05:31 PM

0.75 has less issues than the others, and a lot of improved features - it automatically checks other users share lists and downloads from them if they have the same file (much like torrents, the one file can come from many sources)

0.306 is the old version that doesnt require hashing, but lacks all the awesome features (and tends to bog down a machine more - it seems to hash when files are requested, making it harder to run while gaming)

my advice is to use 0.75 or 0.674 0 or a combination of both.
(i share in 0.75, and download via 0.674)

there is no valid reason to use 0.306 other than pure laziness.
Takes too long to hash? tough. you only have to do it ONCE.

Posted by: Jeffy Nov 8 2009, 10:29 PM

QUOTE (Mussels @ Nov 8 2009, 06:31 PM)

there is no valid reason to use 0.306 other than pure laziness.Takes too long to hash? tough. you only have to do it ONCE.

DC .306 has been run always for the sharing of legitimate files such as Linux ISO's etc. I've never had issues, people whinge "Oh its running too slow". For some of us, hashing is a long and ardous task that given .306 works PERFECTLY fine.I tried 0.75, it has issues I disagree with...1) Days to hash2) Hardly anyone uses it3) 0.306 works fine.Long and the short of it, use 0.306

Posted by: SirSquidness Nov 8 2009, 11:33 PM

http://respawn.com.au/forums/index.php?showtopic=546